MF Researcher Database

Researchers Database

Advance

Koichi Inazawa

    Department of Social Welfare Studies　Professor
    Research Center for Development of Welfare Society　Researcher
    Human Care and Support Course　Professor
    Course of Human Life Studies　Professor
Last Updated :2024/04/23

Researcher Information

URL

Research funding number

  • 50278165

J-Global ID

Research Interests

  • 理論福祉学   精神保健福祉   

Research Areas

  • Humanities & social sciences / Social welfare

Academic & Professional Experience

  • 2023/04 - Today  東洋大学福祉社会デザイン学部教授
  • 2012 - 2023/03  Toyo UniversityFaculty of Human Life Design教授
  • 2004 - 2012  Hosei UniversityFaculty of Social Policy and Administration教授
  • 1998 - 2004  Toyo UniversityFaculty of Sociology助教授
  • 1995 - 1998  Nagano University産業社会学部専任講師

Education

  •        -   東洋大学大学院社会学研究科社会福祉学専攻博士後期課程修了

Association Memberships

  • 日本病院・地域精神医学会   日本精神障害者リハビリテーション学会   日本社会福祉実践理論学会   日本社会福祉学会   

Published Papers

Books etc

  • 現代社会福祉分析の再構築
    古川孝順編 (Contributor第1部第5章援助関係論の再構築に向けて)2022/09 9784805887721
  • 稲沢 公一 誠信書房 2022/08 4414601657 168
  • 認め合い、支え合う福祉社会の近未来
    東洋大学福祉社会開発研究センター (Contributor第1章第2節「福祉原理としての『無条件の肯定』」－日本の仏教思想を参照して－)中央法規出版 2022/03 9784805884485
  • つながり、支え合う福祉社会の仕組みづくり
    東洋大学福祉社会開発研究センター (Contributor第8章相模原障害者殺傷事件からみえること)中央法規 2018/03
  • 稲沢 公一 (Single work)有斐閣 2017/06 4641221006 216
  • 稲沢 公一 (Single work)誠信書房 2015/09 4414601541 130
  • 稲沢 公一; 岩崎 晋也 (Joint work)有斐閣 2014/10 464117721X 294
  • 駒村 康平; 斉藤 弥生; 稲沢 公一 NHK出版 2014/07 414910896X 128
  • 福田 素生; 岡部 卓; 尾形 裕也; 駒村 康平; 稲沢 公一 (Joint work)医学書院 2013/02 4260016822 291
  • 対論 社会福祉学４－ソーシャルワークの思想
    稲沢 公一 (Contributorテーマ１論文２「ソーシャルワーク初期段階の価値をめぐる葛藤－リッチモンドの足跡をたどって－」)中央法規出版 2012/11
  • 精神保健福祉相談援助の基盤－新・精神保健福祉士養成講座第３巻
    稲沢 公一 (Contributor第５章「相談援助の形成過程」)中央法規出版 2012/02
  • 福田 素生; 岡部 卓; 駒村 康平; 石渡 和実; 稲沢 公一 (Joint work)医学書院 2009/12 4260008099 284
  • 小澤 温; 稲沢 公一 (Joint work)ミネルヴァ書房 2008/05 4623051218 226
  • 稲沢 公一; 岩崎 晋也 (Joint work)有斐閣 2008/02 4641177066 280
  • わが国におけるソーシャルワーク実践の展開－小松源助先生の研究業績の継承を願って－
    川島書店 2008
  • 生活支援の社会福祉学
    有斐閣 2007
  • 障害・病いと「ふつう」のはざまで－軽度障害者どっちつかずのジレンマを語る
    明石書店 2006
  • 岩崎 晋也; 稲沢 公一; 池本 美和子 (Joint work)有斐閣 2005/03 4641076952 282
  • 社会福祉原論－精神保健福祉士養成セミナー第９巻〔三訂版〕
    へるす出版 2005
  • ソーシャルワークの実践モデル
    川島書店 2005
  • 岩崎 晋也; 稲沢 公一 へるす出版 2005 4892695297
  • 新版 社会福祉援助技術
    建帛社 2004
  • 社会福祉士のための基礎知識Ⅰ
    中央法規 2003
  • 古川 孝順; 稲沢 公一; 岩崎 晋也; 児島 亜紀子 (Joint work)有斐閣 2002/07 4641076545 265
  • 系統看護学講座 社会福祉
    医学書院 2002
  • 精神障害者地域リハビリテーション実践ガイド
    日本評論社 2002
  • ソーシャルワーカーのための法学
    有斐閣 2002
  • 援助するということ
    有斐閣 2002
  • 障害者福祉とソーシャルワーク
    有斐閣 2001
  • ぜんかれん家族講座２：家族の生き方
    (財)全国精神障害者家族会連合会 2000
  • （翻訳）ソーシャルワーク実践におけるエンパワーメント－その理論と実際の論考集
    相川書房 2000
  • 稲沢 公一; 精神障害者ピア; サポートセンターこらーる; たいとう 精神障害者ピア・サポートセンターこらーる・たいとう 2000
  • 生活支援Ⅱ－生活支援活動を創り上げていく過程
    やどかり出版 1999
  • 社会福祉原論－精神保健福祉士養成セミナー第９巻
    へるす出版 1998
  • 精神障害者観の現況'97－全国無作為サンプル2000人の調査から
    (財)全国精神障害者家族会連合会 1998
  • 社会福祉方法原論
    法律文化社 1997
  • みんなで歩けば道になる－全家連30年のあゆみ－
    (財)全国精神障害者家族会連合会 1997
  • （翻訳）高齢者エンパワーメントの基礎－ソーシャルワーク実践の発展を目指して
    相川書房 1997
  • 救護・更生施設の精神障害者－の生活と福祉ニーズ－
    (財)全国精神障害者家族会連合会 1995
  • 小松 源助; 稲沢 公一 (Joint translation)ランバート マグワァイア 川島書店 1994/05 4761005327 257
  • 精神障害者・家族の生活と福祉ニーズ'93（Ⅱ）－全国地域生活本人調査編－
    (財)全国精神障害者家族会連合会 1994
  • （翻訳）対人援助のためのソーシャルサポートシステム
    川島書店 1994
  • （翻訳）精神の障害－臨床、法制度その実際－
    三輪書店 1994
  • 精神障害者・家族の生活と福祉ニーズ'93（Ⅰ）－全国家族調査編－
    (財)全国精神障害者家族会連合会 1993
  • （翻訳）ソーシャルワークとヘルスケア－イギリスの実践に学ぶ－
    中央法規出版 1993

MISC

Research Grants & Projects

  • Creation of new values and support systems in welfare society
    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science：Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Research (Pioneering)
    Date (from‐to) : 2022/06 -2027/03 
    Author : 志村 健一; 金子 光一; 古川 和稔; 稲沢 公一; 窪田 佳寛; 横田 祥; 高山 直樹; 佐藤 亜樹; 藤木 聡美; 荻野 剛史; 三重野 清顕; 高野 聡子
  • 日本学術振興会：科学研究費助成事業
    Date (from‐to) : 2022/04 -2027/03 
    Author : 國重 智宏; 稲沢 公一
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science：Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    Date (from‐to) : 2004 -2006 
    Author : OZAWA Atsushi; TAKAYAMA Naoki; YOSHIKAWA Kaori; INAZWA Koichi; MATOBA Tomoko
     
    In 2004th year, we examined the four subjects about the concept on empowerment of persons with disabilities. These subjects were, "a consideration about the meaning of the initiative of persons with disabilities", "community development for independent living of persons with disabilities", "a consideration about the idea of community living of persons with disabilities" and "the study on the stigma retarding the empowerment of persons with mental disorder". We also examined the subjects by the feasible study. These subjects were, "the new role of the institutions of persons with intellectual disabilities in the community" and "the formulation of services supporting for persons with mental disorder in the community". The 2005th year and the 2006th year, we examined the four subjects about the concept on empowerment of persons with disabilities. These subjects were, "a consideration about the support to strengthen empowerment of persons with disabilities", "the empowerment practice to persons with severely intellectual disabilities in Sweden", "the discussion on mental disorder as social narrative". We also examined the subjects by the survey. These subjects were, "the role of the self-help group of persons with mental disorder to strengthen empowerment", "the study on the stigma retarding empowerment of persons with mental disorder", "the needs and problems about the independent living of women with physical disabilities", "the development of support system for community living of persons with disabilities and the elderly in Okinawa prefecture". It was examined about the arrangement of the idea on empowerment of persons with disabilities in the community through these theory research and survey.
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science：Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
    Date (from‐to) : 1999 -2000 
    Author : SONODA Kyoichi; OTSUBO Shozo; YAMATE Shigeru; KUBOTA Kyoko; INAZAWA Koichi; HOSOI Yoko
     
    Two cities were selected as research areas in the U.S. ; one was St.Louis, Missouri, and another was Missoula, Montana. St.Louis comprised of two distinctive areas : the suburban area where majority of residents were upper-to middle class white, and the city area where majority of residents were African Americans, one third of residents were dependent on social welfare, and violent crimes were concentrated. Addressing needs of the different groups, a wide range of approaches were observed. In the suberban area, nonprofit organizations and informal groups were actively operating to discuss and resolve common issues among the upper-to middle-class residents. For example, Independent Center and Wellness Community, both of which were private nonprofit organizations, were providing support to those who were suffering from cancer or those who were physically or mentally challenged. The goal of their activities was to help the people live in the community while maintaining their independency. In the inner city area the economic development was the primary issue. Charitable organizations were taking crucial roles as well by delegating professionals and volunteers to provide support to residents in need. Missoula was known as 'one of the most comfortable cities to live in' (Forbes). Primary residents were white who were decendents of European immigrants. The culture seems to be relatively homogeneous, while there were some indications of diversily ; preservation areas for native Americans were located around the Missoula area, as well as the increasing number of Vietnamese immigrants. Montana, University was serving as an anchor in comnmunity organization. The Community College Program organized by Montana University was an example of its effort to reach out to native Americans. At the same time, the government assumed a leadership in strengthening neighborhood councils of all over the city area while residents and business sector were organizing charitable activities such as the Food Bank Program in order to respond to the increasing number of residents in need. In addition, private organizations were operating to improve the quality of life among residents, such as Aging Service which was providing support to the elderly and Family First which supported devorcees.

Other link

researchmap