岩手大学教育学部附属教育実践総合センター研究紀要 = The Journal of the Clinical Research Center for Child Development and Educational Practices 岩手大学教育学部附属教育実践総合センター 16 93 - 102 2432-9231 2017/03
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science:Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
Date (from‐to) : 2017/04 -2020/03
Author : Minagawa Taku
This study compares the concept of 'correctness' in the middle and early modern period with that in northwestern Eurasia and Christian regions. As the result, following points were clarified. (1) Interpretation of the spirit, violence and majority rule is the key point, (2) the background of differences in "correct recognition" among countries is differences in acceptance of the Bible and humanities knowledge, (3) critical reexamination of the theory of "de-magicization" is necessary, and (4) when "correctness" is used to justify a modern state and becomes a resiliency, one closes oneself and stops being "correct recognition," but when "correctness" = orthodoxy, which requires a theological existence, it is always overwritten by the relationship with others and develops into an abstract "correct recognition."
中世フランス王国の政治文化ーカペー・ヴァロワ両王朝期の知識人とその作品ー
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science:Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science:Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
Date (from‐to) : 2015/04 -2018/03
Author : Kawahara Atsushi; Watanabe Setsuo
This research project was intended to make clear the medieval European world through the viewpoints of analyzing the political ideology(royal power, papal authority) and social system (kingdom, empire, cities, etc.). Thirteen researchers analyzed each area (kingdam and cities), and showed the differecne and uniquness of each area through the comparative hisotrical approach. As a result we could show some specific character of each kingdam(empire) and cities by the ideological and institutional analysis. This result will surely contribute to understand the reality of the medieval European World.
As admitted “additionally” in the autumn of 2013, we lost half an year time to spend for this project. However, we could have 13 meetings with reports made by scholars in and out of this project, respectively: ① 5 meetings for review reports of the recent studies of Japanese scholars; ② 4 meetings for reports of recent tendencies of historical studies in the West; ③ 4 meetings for principal points of studies of the individual members of this project, especial- ly in the context of recent Western tendencies. We also could have 2 more open lectures by excellent academics from without, with fruitful results through very active discussions. Thus, we believe that we made sure progress in many points for the theme, and achieve mutual understandings of individual studies of members. These should work as the basement for our new book expected to be published in 2017.